Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Divam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be little more than a foreign word definition. Unreferenced. Derek Andrews (talk) 23:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC) Derek Andrews (talk) 23:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:11, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:11, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Uanfala 10:42, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this looks like it should be on Wiktionary, not here. I see quite a few references in books, but not seeing much via Google as far as why this concept merits an encyclopedia article. = paul2520 (talk) 19:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 14:28, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TNT or possibly WP:NOTDICT. It's unclear to me whether this is meant to be a word definition (which is out of scope) or a given name. The latter would be in scope, but the current content is not really helpful for creating a WP:WPNAMES article. Cnilep (talk) 01:44, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.